[chef-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: local file copy resource?

[Jesse Campbell < >]

I'll get started on a local_file resource and provider, which will steal functionality from cookbook_file. Then I will modify cookbook_file to be extending local_file to remove the reuse.

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Daniel DeLeo < " target="_blank"> > wrote:

On Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Jesse Campbell wrote:

Okay, so what would you like to see? FileCopy provider for local file operations, and CookbookFile extends FileCopy? Where to put Bryan's move?

Happy to go about this differently, but a local option to cookbookfile seems backwards

I agree a local option to cookbook file isn't the right way to go. My favored options are either a file_copy resource and provider, or a local option to remote file.

-- 

Daniel DeLeo