- From: Matt Ray <
- To: Mike <
>, Bryan McLellan <
- Cc: "
- Subject: [chef-dev] RE: Re: Re: CHEF-3788: More restrictive gem dependencies?
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:26:50 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
I know my vote is to target Chef 11. Here's to hoping that Chef 10.18 stays
very stable for a long time and we can move forward. Introducing changes this
late is probably asking for trouble.
Senior Technical Evangelist | Opscode Inc.
| (512) 731-2218
Twitter, IRC, GitHub: mattray
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 7:25 PM
To: Bryan McLellan
Subject: [chef-dev] Re: Re: CHEF-3788: More restrictive gem dependencies?
I guess I just volunteered? Should we target Chef 10.18.2, or Chef 11?
i.e. which branch is the "best" one?
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Bryan McLellan
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Mike
>> I'm a big fan of looking at each dependency and seeing if they
>> explicitly declare that:
>> a) they follow SemVer
>> b) they are past 1.0
>> In that case, using '~> 1.0' is great. Using anything under 1.0, i.e.
>> moneta, should probably be nailed to the working version, until it's a
>> problem and deserves revisiting.
> If you wanted to do all that research and document your findings in
> comments in the gemspec, that would probably be useful, being such a
> fan of research that you are. :)
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.