- From: Tollef Fog Heen <
>
- To: "
Dev" <
>
- Subject: [chef-dev] Re: Re: Re: dependency spaghetti
- Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 08:16:53 +0200
]] Noah Kantrowitz
>
There has been a long running concept to turn #suggests into an
>
optional form of #depends, so it would have the same effect as depends
>
if the cookbook is found in terms of triggering a download and loading
>
in the right order, but wouldn't cause a failure if that cookbook
>
wasn't found. Maybe after I get this dialect stuff squared away I'll
>
write up that patch :)
As a minor nit, it'd be nice to use recommends for this, rather than
suggests, to be more in line with what the terms mean in Debian
packaging. (A Suggests is a weaker Recommends which is a weaker
Depends.) The exact semantics won't line up, but having the strength of
them line up would be less confusing.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
- [chef-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: dependency spaghetti, (continued)
[chef-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: dependency spaghetti, Seth Falcon, 10/03/2013
[chef-dev] Re: Re: Re: dependency spaghetti, Tollef Fog Heen, 10/02/2013
[chef-dev] Re: dependency spaghetti, Lamont Granquist, 10/02/2013
[chef-dev] Re: dependency spaghetti, Peter Donald, 10/02/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.