[chef-dev] Re: Re: Re: chef-server versioning

[Daniel DeLeo < >]

The server team decided to abandon “dev-odd” versioning. When 
Chef/then-Opscode originally adopted dev-odd, Chef was a ruby-only project, 
distributed as a rubygem, and rubygems did not yet support prerelease 
versions. Those things have changed and our tooling (omnibus) produces 
packages with extra version fields to indicate non-release builds.  

--  
Daniel DeLeo


On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Barthélemy Vessemont wrote:

> even versions are release version.
> odd versions are dev version, and never should be released.
>  
> That's why cookbook's version jump 2 by 2.
>  
>  
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:09 AM, JJ Asghar 
> <
 
>  
> (mailto:
 )>
>  wrote:
> >  
> > Seth Vergo rolls a d20-1 and says hey that works?
> > </joke>
> >  
> > -
> > - JJ Asghar
> >  
> > > On Mar 18, 2014, at 19:43, "Noah Kantrowitz" 
> > > <
 
> > >  
> > > (mailto:
 )>
> > >  wrote:
> > >  
> > > Is there a reason the versions for chef-server go 11.0.0, 11.0.2, 
> > > 11.0.4, 11.0.6, 11.0.8, 11.0.10, 11.0.11?
> > >  
> > > --Noah
>  
>  
>  
> --  
> Barthélemy Vessemont - 
> 
 
>  
> (mailto:
 )
> Ingénieur en informatique diplômé de l'UTC (Compiègne)