[chef-dev] Re: RFC: Template Verification

[Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten < >]

For backwards compatible, I'd support whichever is easiest to convey the idea.

Also +1 to verification!

--
~j

> On Jul 31, 2014, at 11:57, Steven Danna 
> <
 >
>  wrote:
> 
> Ohai Chefs,
> 
> I've posted a small RFC here:
> 
> https://github.com/opscode/chef-rfc/pull/38
> 
> about a feature I'd like to add to Chef.
> 
> This RFC is also interesting to me in terms of the emerging chef-rfc
> process.  In the past, I would have proposed a feature this small
> simply as a pull request with the code already written.  For small,
> backwards compatible features, is that preferable over an RFC?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Steven