- From: "Scott M. Likens" <
>
- To:
- Subject: [chef-dev] Re: turning the opscode-webui2 repo from private to public
- Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 14:01:50 -0800
My 10c,
If nothing else they could create an empty public repo just for
reporting bugs. I admit CoreOS made me fond of this idea as it helps
with triage.
https://github.com/coreos/bugs/issues
On 1/10/15 4:44 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
Hi,
>
>
I've asked this at the last irc meeting, but it wasn't on the agenda so
>
I was asked to discuss it at a later time.
>
I was told that the webui2 repo is kept private mainly because it is a
>
proprietary product. When asked how would turning the repo would make
>
any difference when we already share the code publically as part of
>
the opscode-manage plugin/package I was told that there are some
>
javascript files which are only available in minified form in the package.
>
Given how easy is to reformat js code if no other obfuscated method is
>
used, I think that keeping the repo private doesn't really help with
>
anything, but makes it harder to report bugs (as AFAIK the prefered
>
method is to use github issues for reporting the bug to the appropriate
>
repository) or to send pull request.
>
I would like to know if there are other reasons for keeping the repo
>
private or if there is any chance or plans for turning it into public.
>
>
Thanks!
>
>
--
>
Ferenc Kovács
>
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
>
!DSPAM:54b11ea3231786337816477!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.