- From: Joel Merrick <
>
- To:
- Subject: [chef] Re: Re: Interesting..
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:01:12 +0000
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=GWmfMP19i/r1kTrmscTK1Y8MLzHTmFqWNH47p0JFqsZdkLQNxk97efubO+vGad3h7Z LwyyY3uCAnf4W+rtCRMF+IfNrBpqH3jVRz4lRBbswtgmtDpHeETNZxOc/kU1XWFfw2ze bIeSWq+11B3Dt42td7PYQTQH8MBE8FQaQ7UUY=
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ringo De Smet
<
">
> wrote:
Joel,
2010/1/14 Joel Merrick <
">
>:
I always wonder why people want to re-implement something, just for
the sake of the implementation language.
Ringo
Perhaps the person that wrote it (presumably) has large amount of Python knowledge?
I understand where you're coming from though.. I thought it was quite flattering for Chef though, to be used as a reference point.
--
$ echo "kpfmAdpoofdufevq/dp/vl" | perl -pe 's/(.)/chr(ord($1)-1)/ge'
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.