[chef] Re: Re: raise_unless


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Dreamcat4 < >
  • To:
  • Subject: [chef] Re: Re: raise_unless
  • Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:03:28 +0100
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=HyPcTrgIERIF/xqOqIV9uGt+cm/0WKdD3NAfxBeLCdl86NeAitSXtrzwaXzswDZ4c2 I0q8U05JONiV+ezKDSC8csPQiGj17a8C2inulUZI0kljbgKyheUKyD0kgmEbR1WkSwkp rHkloLkQPeANEjtBUFewLc2GutCPoEVUxv8wA=

On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 6:37 AM, Andrew Shafer 
< >
 wrote:
>
> I have some configurations where there is not really a sensible default and
> I want to ensure the cookbook parameters are pushed down from another
> cookbook or role.

+1

When cookbooks depend on each other, theres some situations where its
best to share certain attributes between the cookbooks. So having
raise_unless (or an equivalent) seems like a good idea.

dreamcat4




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

§