- From: Alex Soto <
>
- To:
- Cc: Chef Dev <
>
- Subject: [chef] Re: Re: Re: Contributing to Cookbooks (was chef & hoptoad)
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:47:11 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=AydARTxvoFNPzqHBo6AQ+DoJSDGRjqk/1BnW5YGGy4Xcd0iIXZ9aaftokc1fyAnxPn 6QTsGJOn+5heTJKl0T7k2UjWfnf1tn4SK2c+eXq226WFFvr6MVv4gAUKGRLTZrWNBc8M +T7F5NnpSo5AERJpijepiAwniuWlMRugWGGpE=
On Jul 15, 2010, at 7:05 PM, Joshua Timberman wrote:
>
On Jul 15, 2010, at 4:31 PM, Alex Soto wrote:
>
>
> First I mainly spend my time with chef developing cookbooks, so how would
>
> I 'contribute' a cookbook while not incurring a lot of overhead ? For
>
> example, I create a cookbook that I haven't seen in the wild, I'd like to
>
> publish it for others to use and enhance, but since it's in my private
>
> repo, how would I do that?
>
>
If you would like to simply publish a new cookbook that doesn't "exist" in
>
the wild yet, the best place to put that is the Opscode cookbooks site.
>
>
Then other people can discover and use your cookbook by downloading it with
>
the 'vendor branch' workflow.
Great news. I was under the impression that the cookbooks site was just a
distribution method for the cookbooks in the opscode cookbooks repo. I wasn't
aware I could just push things up there. What happens to a cookbook I push
up there? Does it get reviewed, or does it go right up on the site?
>
>
> One idea would be that I have another cookbooks repo where I publish the
>
> cookbook and be able to import it using the existing vendor stuff knife
>
> provides but use it against other repo's than just the cookbooks site.
>
>
Currently knife only supports the Opscode cookbooks site, since it provides
>
an API that we can use directly. I do not knife if the dev team has plans
>
to implement support for other sites or methods by which to 'vendor'
>
cookbooks. The advantage of the Opscode site vs say GitHub is that it
>
integrates well with the Platform, and its a better known quantity for the
>
API usage. But I'll let Adam or Dan speak up about potential roadmap topics
>
in that regard.
I looked at the code, and I see what you mean, but it seems like it's just
pulling down a tarball. By pointing to another repo and using git archive,
you can mimic that behavior. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem that github
allows using that command to pull a single cookbook as a tarball so it may
not be useful for github, but private github repo's work that way.
- [chef] Re: chef & hoptoad, (continued)
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.