- From: Ringo De Smet <
>
- To:
- Subject: [chef] Re: Re: cookbook version
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:26:47 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=eXZuE9s/5/lLfZINU4NwGHa7Od/Cpc7KuONyzEvdxm2sZ+1A08eexIt8EZtzmJqgeD Pk5WW4oLH6GVbmPVoeB5xlDHWJC2oLVDq9x9buktnyVeZJ2P9/jwbMAJBr/BGwCScEFk uic5jPODJCYwOi8aMwCADEgxwmzSm4KIWJwPc=
Thom,
On 4 August 2010 13:05, Thom May
<
>
wrote:
>
>
That's how it will work, yes. The code is scheduled to land in 0.10
>
AIUI; you can have and store multiple versions of cookbooks right now,
>
but there's no way to select which one to use - you'll always get the
>
latest one.
What does Chef server (in 0.9.x) consider to be the latest? I have a
suspicion that the server compares version numbers string wise instead
of numerically. I had two versions of the java cookbook on my server
(0.9.0 and 0.10.0), both coming from cookbooks.opscode.com. When
running the java cookbook, the client always gets the 0.9.0 version. I
had to remove the 0.9.0 version first before the 0.10.0 version gets
picked up.
Ringo
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.