General discussion about Chef

[chef] question about merb ["~> 1.1.0"]


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Sean OMeara < >
  • To:
  • Subject: [chef] question about merb ["~> 1.1.0"]
  • Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 14:03:24 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=FedTf7bAGS7UUm9ePGe8HozPCM4BCCOB7V3hIgVyHGkWom3O2OkoTzCb/q3H4Ls77u 6nia1XbsLIELn5gxbfbCOLAFBQPzud1UDhiO1/3leYlgTBLLzWBVhrz+oopqi0aINKB4 0naplpJWpgdyV2wsRh1/E+0fcUMXWvYf9cM8k=
In an attempt to future proof the RHEL packages, I tried building
existing ELFF spec against fc12.

The patching phase failed for fuzz level reasons.
While attempting to fix it, I noticed the patch was relaxing the merb
requirement to [ => 0 ], while the gemspec specifies [ ~> 1.1.0 ]

RHEL6 will be shipping with merb 1.0.15.

My question is: Does chef currently use merb 1.1.0 specific features?

If so, that would explain a lot of strange things I've been seeing
running 0.9.8.

Either way, I'll be making an updated merb rpm set.

Stay tuned

-s

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

§