[chef] Re: Re: apt package provider: a lot of return code 100 on apt-get


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Ringo De Smet < >
  • To:
  • Subject: [chef] Re: Re: apt package provider: a lot of return code 100 on apt-get
  • Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:47:56 +0200
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=pUSP4UszMk5b4gd1QIfaJ8CyggDQ9JRSoF/QN+21rk1ySfhtxxulPUFV5O4Ezl/1mi qjVR251Uad38r1sOkM+tS7HaGAyNVSZHMJ2R9d0gnkE3PqcCHgJlm9HHlyl7IVo19wmP YJ/1Mv8i560ksq9g5JVNdvRa61M1e6GQ5786o=

Bryan,

On 30 September 2010 18:09, Bryan McLellan 
< >
 wrote:
>
> Are you using any repositories that would not be signed by the
> upstream keys, such as a local mirror or additional local package
> repository?

No. The apt bootstrap process adds apt.opscode.com, but that is OK as
the key is also added. See my response to Dan's suggestion for a more
detailed description of where it fails: the first daemonized
chef-client run just after knife bootstrap!

Ringo


  • [chef] Re: Re: apt package provider: a lot of return code 100 on apt-get, Ringo De Smet, 10/01/2010

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

§