General discussion about Chef

[chef] Re: Re: Re: Re: chef, CentOS/RedHat, and rubygem-rest-client updates


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Sean OMeara < >
  • To:
  • Cc: KC Braunschweig < >
  • Subject: [chef] Re: Re: Re: Re: chef, CentOS/RedHat, and rubygem-rest-client updates
  • Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:00:23 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=vxDje2XawRzIMphAhiux8rbKxrAQg8TqZ2NPoFR85QuomEaTIbvMOSPipJiCfSTVCx j67vGs1LpTcMnGtBEy1bFvHjdKFpO0mC1WszGOyq1gJhWIiFJ0Xcya47C0KqWIhJXkkn ceBbs5VoYjh0/RLlLE6Ty2RIwAL8W6CuWB42Q=
I maintain RPMs targeted towards Fedora. They should work on RHEL6 /
SL6 and Centos6 whenever they get around to putting it out

http://yum.afistfulofservers.net/affs-chef/fedora/13/x86_64/

-s

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:46 PM, KC Braunschweig
< >
 wrote:
> +1 for better RHEL/CentOS support and supported RPMs especially. I
> really like Chef but it's a hard sell at a company with hundreds or
> thousands of RHEL servers at the moment. A couple of you mentioned
> only using gems, but going that route I seem to keep hitting Ruby path
> issues. Plus I don't really like the idea of having to install
> compilers and devel packages on all my prod machines so they can gem
> install various libraries. Wondering if I need to break down and just
> roll my own RPMs until Opscode has a supported yum repo.
>
> KC Braunschweig
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Joshua Timberman 
> < >
>  wrote:
>> Ohai!
>> And we're working to improve those in the near future :-).
>

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

§