- From: "John E. Vincent (lusis)" <
>
- To:
- Subject: [chef] Re: Re: [[chef-dev]] Re: [[chef-dev]] Chef 0.10.0 is Now in Beta
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 23:38:46 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=hzyr0221mZmz/c13k/eE23ZaLiLGjxDkWB5bTZ/pf4qoi+hlDyqVKJ6m3/7G7gFRKQ eLSgFzhe36mIKpEcWvWURCFI/6gzsbd+lMwmzgQ+cvQxg/pm3AjSuQs1D5ox25SyCmeR 3JTBQDmPV8fb8WXOBuX4OjXBsMX7Fw4KPaMKM=
I've been pimping FPM as an alternative lately. It won't build you a
valid replacement RPM for 1.8.6 (i.e. cleanly upgrade). What I do is
just never bother to install the 1.8.6 repo and install the FPM
generated one from bootstrap:
FPM -
https://github.com/jordansissel/fpm
Scripts -
https://github.com/lusis/fpm-scripts/tree/master/centos55/x86_64/ruby-1.9.2p180
My bootstrap template -
https://gist.github.com/881068
Mind you if you put the effort into the FPM process (break it into a
package structure that mirrors what RHEL/CentOS does - ruby-devel,
ruby-libs, ruby-rubygems) you could get a very clean replacement. My
version is just a monolithic package.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:26 PM, James
<
>
wrote:
>
gecode and gecode-devel have been rebuilt without qt/gist support for fc13,
>
fc14, rhel 5 and centos 5 (rpm.aegisco.com).
>
The repo and spec files are in the appropriate directories on
>
rpm.aegisco.com.
>
ruby 1.8.7 and rubygems 1.6.2 for fc13 and fc14 are up as well.
>
We're having a lot of trouble with building ruby 1.8.7 packages on CentOS /
>
RHEL 5. Is anyone aware of one already built?
>
Please report back any progress you have on building a 0.10.0 server on any
>
of these platforms.
>
James
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.