[chef] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Installing handlers with chef_handler

[Seth Chisamore < >]

 Zac, 
The chef_handler cookbook should be all fixed [0]. Please try version 1.0.4 
which can be downloaded from the community site [1]:

 knife cookbook site install chef_handler

Hope that helps! 

Seth

-- 
Opscode, Inc.
Seth Chisamore, Senior Technical Evangelist
IRC, Skype, Twitter, Github: schisamo


[0] http://tickets.opscode.com/browse/COOK-654
[1] http://community.opscode.com/cookbooks/chef_handler


On Thursday, July 21, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Zac Stevens wrote:

> Hi Seth,
> 
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Seth Chisamore 
> <
 
>  
> (mailto:
 )>
>  wrote:
> > You could fork the repo, but the preferred way would be to just track the 
> > upstream cookbook in your local chef-repo using the 'vendor branch' 
> > pattern. An implementation of this pattern (that works with git) is built 
> > into 'knife cookbook site install'.
> > 
> > This command does the following:
> <--snip-->
> 
> Yup, I know all that - but it's not much good for being able to show
> this list what I've done with the cookbook that I'm having trouble
> with :)
> 
> Other possible alternatives are pasting stuff into the message,
> attaching files, or dumping stuff into gists - but all of those feel a
> bit crufty.
> 
> In other words, there's a well-documented workflow for managing one's
> own repository, when everything's going well. However, that workflow
> doesn't seem well-suited either to soliciting help, or pushing
> fixes/improvements upstream. It's those angles I'm struggling with.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> Zac