[chef] Re: Re: Re: a Cookbook pattern, the "corporate" repository for proprietary packages

[Brian Akins < >]

On Nov 10, 2011, at 6:51 AM, Bryan Berry wrote:

> I think we need a common practice for this. It would be useful for me and 
> you if we used the same name for our respective corporate repos. That way 
> we can more easily reuse each other's recipes. I think "corporate" fits 
> well ;)
> 

We "group" things into repos, and have several repos.  IE, we have one for 
nginx, one for project A, one for project B, etc.  I'm not sure it's a great 
idea, but these packages come from different sources - some are ops built, 
some are vendor provided, some are dev provided, etc.  We have only one 
"internal" gem repo.  I never claimed to be consistent ;)