- From: "Stroomer, Jeff" <
>
- To: "'
'" <
>
- Subject: [chef] RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Ruby for Chef
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:16:01 -0800
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
Brad, et al.,
Were we doing this again, a Full Stack Installer would be interesting. It's
expensive and tedious to have an engineer (e.g., me) put in endless hours
chasing down clerical problems in a software solution built from pieces. And
part of the point of Chef is to automate away that kind of chase.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Brad Knowles
[mailto:
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 9:05 AM
To:
Cc: Brad Knowles
Subject: [chef] Re: RE: Re: RE: Ruby for Chef
On Feb 23, 2012, at 8:52 AM, Stroomer, Jeff wrote:
>
We're on RedHat 5.5, and using release 0.10.4 of the chef client. It's
>
possible that with further fooling around we could have gotten chef to work
>
with the 1.8.7 version of ruby, but our patience for that was limited given
>
that we had other reasons for wanting ruby 1.9.
We're on CentOS 5.6, and got our start with Chef 0.10.4. I spent ... a very
long time ... trying to get everything to install via packages, etc... before
I was introduced to an early version of the Full Stack Installer. We made
the switch, and haven't looked back since.
FSI FTW!
--
Brad Knowles
<
>
SAGE Level IV, Chef Level 0.0.1
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.