[chef] Chef-solo or Chef-client for local testing

[< >]

Hi,

I wanted to get folks opinions on what is better to use for local
infrastructure development chef-solo or chef-client?  

I'm thinking it is nice to be able to have a fully isolated environment using
chef-solo locally with say a Vagrant box or any other vm offering of your
choice.  The reason I say this is if you had all your developers using the 
same
production chef-server and same environment that there is a chance that you
could all stomp on each others toes.  I know you can freeze the version but 
now
I have to keep maintaining my version list locally which I feel could be a
maintenance nightmare if you have a lot of cookbooks.  My thought is you would
use chef-solo for local development and then after you commit your changes it
goes to a continuous integration environment where chef-client is used.  In 
the
continuous integration environment it could use environment=development and
that environment could specify what version to use.  After it has successfully
been tested in the continuous integration environment the production
environment file then gets a bump to use the new version that was just 
tested. 
Anyone see any holes in this process or have any suggestions for a better
approach?  If you think chef-client would be a better choice for local dev can
you offer up some ideas on how it would work with multiple users?

Looking forward to your responses.

I also have this question posted here:
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/chef-testing/3qZfJqOsycU/discussion

Thanks,
Jay