[chef] Re: Re: including erubis fragments within a template

[Mike < >]

Ah - I think I like that approach better - it's very similar to the
/something.d/ method of inclusion - include something it it is there.

Bryan, thoughts?

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Michael Della Bitta
<
 >
 wrote:
> Not a universal fix, but could you possibly do it at a higher level with
> <xml:include> statements?
>
> Michael
>
> On Jun 28, 2012 8:32 AM, "Bryan Berry" 
> <
 >
>  wrote:
>>
>> Dear Chefs,
>>
>> I work on almost basis with the Enterprise Java container known as JBoss
>> AS 7. JBoss's main configuration file, standalone-full.xml,  is a whopping
>> 553 lines long. While it is very long, it actually quite cleanly 
>> structured,
>> especially when compared to something like sendmail.cf
>>
>> Templating such a large file is a mega PITA. JBoss AS 7 is nicely
>> componentized so that you can easily turn on and off modules. This process
>> would be a billion times easier and more readable if I could include
>> fragments within and erubis template like this:
>>
>> <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
>>
>> <server xmlns="urn:jboss:domain:1.2">
>>     <extensions>
>>          <% if @infinispan -%>
>>         <extension module="org.jboss.as.clustering.infinispan"/>
>>         <% end -%>
>>         <extension module="org.jboss.as.web"/>
>>          <% if @webservices -%>
>>         <extension module="org.jboss.as.webservices"/>
>>         <% end -%>
>>         <extension module="org.jboss.as.weld"/>
>>     </extensions>
>>      <% if @infinispan
>>                include_template "infinispan.xml.erb"
>>      end -%>
>>      <% if @webservices
>>                include_template "webservices.xml.erb"
>>      end -%>
>>    <socket-binding-group name="standard-sockets" >
>>     ......
>>    </socket-binding-group>
>> </server>
>>
>> As you can see, this is far more readable than adding complex logic to
>> already large file
>>
>> Is this at all feasible currently in Chef? It would make life a lot easier
>> for me