[chef] Re: Re: Re: chef 10.12 slower?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jay Feldblum < >
  • To:
  • Subject: [chef] Re: Re: Re: chef 10.12 slower?
  • Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 16:34:47 -0400

Ruby 1.9.2 can, in some cases, have pathological Kernel#require performance.

Ruby 1.9.3 with the patch by Sokolov Yura (@funny-falcon) seems to perform much better.

Cheers,
Jay

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:29 PM, John Alberts < " target="_blank"> > wrote:
Sorry about that.  I forgot to mention these are omnibus installer installations.  Wow, what a difference then between the two projects, a 7.5x increase in just the initial startup time.



On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Bryan McLellan < " target="_blank"> > wrote:
> Anyone else notice chef 10.12 release being significantly slow just on
> startup compared to 10.10?

Most of the 10.12.0 packages were built with the new ruby omnibus
project whereas 0.10.10 was mostly the clojure omnibus project, so
there could be significant differences there.

Bryan



--
John Alberts





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

§