[chef] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: chef 10.12 slower?

[KC Braunschweig < >]

FWIW, seems related to https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/issues/73

Would be great to see this resolved. Very irritating.

KC

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Charles Sullivan
<
 >
 wrote:
> Yes, I can verify this.  I also confirmed it was Ruby 1.9.2 by switching out
> to 1.9.3.  For me it wasn't a big deal so I just decided to wait until Ruby
> gets bumped..
>
> --Charlie
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:05 PM, John Alberts 
> <
 >
> wrote:
>>
>> Looks like this already filed as a bug here:
>> http://tickets.opscode.com/browse/CHEF-3295.  Thanks for pointing that out
>> and I guess I should have searched JIRA first. :)
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Phil Dibowitz 
>> <
 >
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> There's a bug for this (don't have the link but it was filed
>>> recently)...it's only omnibus and only on platforms where omnibus has the
>>> newer version of rubygems
>>> --
>>> Sent from my phone... Excuse horrible formatting.
>>>
>>> John Alberts 
>>> <
 >
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> >Sorry about that.  I forgot to mention these are omnibus installer
>>> >installations.  Wow, what a difference then between the two projects, a
>>> >7.5x increase in just the initial startup time.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Bryan McLellan 
>>> ><
 >
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:15 PM, John Alberts
>>> >> <
 >
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > Anyone else notice chef 10.12 release being significantly slow just
>>> >> > on
>>> >> > startup compared to 10.10?
>>> >>
>>> >> Most of the 10.12.0 packages were built with the new ruby omnibus
>>> >> project whereas 0.10.10 was mostly the clojure omnibus project, so
>>> >> there could be significant differences there.
>>> >>
>>> >> Bryan
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >--
>>> >John Alberts
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> John Alberts
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Charles Sullivan
> 
 
>