[chef] Re: Re: Minitest-handler cookbook issue

[Sachin Sagar Rai < >]

Thanks for the reply.

But still wondering where to put that 'ignore on failure' line? In tests?

Where to put it exactly?

-------------------------------------------

@millisami
~ Sachin Sagar Rai
Ruby on Rails Developer
http://tfm.com.np
http://nepalonrails.tumblr.com

Sent with Sparrow

On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 at 11:41 PM, steve . wrote:

The minitest handler doesn't know you don't have tests written for

those cookbooks. It's looping through all of the cookbooks for the

recipes in the node's current run list and attempting to pull down

test and support directories from all of them. These resources should

be set to "ignore on failure," so it shouldn't cause your Chef run to

bomb out if they're not there.

At the end of the run, the handler will load all of the tests that

*did* make it to the node and run them. If any of those tests fail,

it will flag your run as failed and your exception handlers will then

run.

If you find the behavior of the handler unsatisfying and find a better

way to pull down tests from all cookbooks, I'm sure the maintainers of

the minitest handler would love to see your improvement in the form of

a pull request!

On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Sachin Sagar Rai < "> > wrote:

Ohai Chefs!

I gave a shot on doing integration testing with the minitest-handler

cookbook.

But it bit me on the first run.

Can anyone testing chef have a few mins on this issue

https://github.com/btm/minitest-handler-cookbook/issues/24 ?

-------------------------------------------

@millisami

~ Sachin Sagar Rai

Ruby on Rails Developer

http://tfm.com.np

http://nepalonrails.tumblr.com

Sent with Sparrow