[chef] Re: should complex lwrps like ark be factored out into separate gems?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Paul Mooring < >
  • To: " " < >
  • Subject: [chef] Re: should complex lwrps like ark be factored out into separate gems?
  • Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 17:37:29 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US

I think lwrps and gems have pretty different use cases.  You do have a
substantial amount of code in private functions that could be broken out
into a gem, but much of it is still tightly coupled with Chef.  The real
question is would the benefits of having a general Ruby library (via a
gem) be enough to merit the work of decoupling your code from Chef and
refactoring the lwrp to use a gem.
--
Paul Mooring
Systems Engineer and Customer Advocate

www.opscode.com




-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Berry 
< >
Reply-To: 
" "
 
< >
Date: Saturday, October 27, 2012 8:59 AM
To: 
" "
 
< >
Subject: [chef] should complex lwrps like ark be factored out into
separate gems?

>As my ark LWRP becomes increasingly complex, I start to wonder whether
>I should factor it out into a separate ruby gem. What would be the
>pros and cons of this approach? An aspiring rubyist wants to know.
>
>https://github.com/bryanwb/chef-ark
>





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

§