On Nov 24, 2012, at 5:35 PM, Jesse Nelson wrote: Sorry last line should have read: " IMO these goals can be obtained in the same _cookbook_ " On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Joshua Timberman < "> > wrote:Second, COOK-1953[1]. This proposes the removal of all the sourcecompiling parts of the nginx cookbook to a new cookbook, "nginx_source."[1]: http://tickets.opscode.com/browse/COOK-1953
I disagree. The largest issue I see in having them in the same cookbook is the dependencies they carry. In a security or compliance sensitive environment I may not even want build-essentials on my Chef server, much less on my node (even if it isn't being used). I can see a compelling case for splitting cookbooks when there are large sets of dependencies that are not used by a piece that is useful to many people. |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.