pxe_dust is intended for simple pxe booting and Chef client installation, not nearly as ambitious as some of the other tools out there (no BIOS management for example). There are additional features planned, but I plan on keeping the feature set fairly small
and focused. Razor has recently gained Chef support thanks to Fletcher Nichol's work, that's another alternative.
The original discussion of Managed Nodes was around using Chef to automate devices that could not install a Chef client on them. It's still a goal for Chef, but progress has been made with installation of Chef on Arista and similar switches in the meantime.
Thanks,
Matt Ray
Senior Technical Evangelist | Opscode Inc.
| (512) 731-2218
Twitter, IRC, GitHub: mattray
From: Maxime Brugidou
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 11:30 AM To: Subject: [chef] Re: Re: "Managed Nodes" in chef for network switched, PDUs... Hi Brian, we will probably move ou tftp/pxe cookbooks to pxe_dust since it looks well maintained and we didn't notice it at the time we built our first cookbooks.
Our internal solution has an initramfs image (similar to sledgehammer in Crowbar) that is configured to boot and run chef-client, set its initial run list to "role[firstboot]" if the node does not have a a run list yet. New nodes pop up in chef
just like they would on Crowbar and we can provision them using "standard" chef operations (basically assigning a run list).
We have an OS cookbook that install the operating system and reboots (only if needed, some nodes are also running diskless).
I'd love to discuss more about the topic, since we are also building our next provisioning infrastructure. My current concern is about hardware devices that can't run chef-client (but have a management API).
Maxime
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Brian Hatfield
<
" target="_blank">
> wrote:
|
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.