- From: Brian Akins <
>
- To:
- Subject: [chef] Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Role Versioning?
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 06:57:32 -0500
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Kevin Keane Subscription
<
>
wrote:
>
A third difference is that I don't need to declare all the cookbooks as
>
dependency in my top-level cookbook.
And that's a good thing? Interested to hear more about your thoughts
about this. I personally like having to declare those dependencies.
>
With include_recipe, I may have
>
dependencies on many cookbooks that aren't even relevant to a particular
>
server.
Like yum dependencies on an ubuntu box. That always bugged me as
well, but I finally just started ignoring it.
>
Of course you can still declare a dependency in the metadata if you need it
>
to lock down a version number. You just don't *have* to do it for all your
>
recipes.
The run_list.add doesn't trigger the foodcritic test, which is also a
negative I think.
Always interesting to hear approaches that are different from mine.
--Brian
- [chef] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Role Versioning?, (continued)
[chef] RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Role Versioning?, Kevin Keane Subscription, 02/14/2013
[chef] RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Role Versioning?, Kevin Keane Subscription, 02/14/2013
[chef] Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Role Versioning?, Brian Akins, 02/15/2013
[chef] Re: Role Versioning?, Erik Hollensbe, 02/14/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.