- From: Cassiano Leal <
>
- To:
- Subject: [chef] Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Augeas support
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:26:14 -0300
-----Original message-----
> From:Joshua Timberman <
">
>
>
> By all means, don't use the community cookbook if it doesn't fit your preference, use case, supported platforms or standards.
Totally understood. Unfortunately, when it comes to such a basic cookbook as Apache, that means foregoing a very large share of the benefit of Chef - too many community cookbooks depend on it.
I have been thinking about this problem for a while now. I believe that what Chef needs here is something similar to Virtual Packages on the Debian packaging system.
Basically, abstract notions of a functionality, whose actual implementation is delegated to one or more packages (or in Chef's case, cookbooks).
This way, there could be a "virtual cookbook" apache, that's implemented by whatever apache cookbook I want to use -- be it opscode's, my own homebrewed, or someone else's like something I found on github and that serves my needs.
I'm not sure about the feasibility of such approach, but I'd like to see something along these lines implemented.
Thoughts?
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.