[chef] Re: Re: Re: delayed execution order error?

[Tensibai < >]

Hum.. I remember having to define services with action :nothing to be able to notify them.

I'm quite sure you have an action :restart inside the service declaration. Fot what I understand, the service is define to restart, it does restart and ignore any notification as it has already do what it was suppose to do (restart).

Set action to nothing in your service and notifications for restart will be ok I think.

Tensibai

 

Le 2013-02-21 17:29, Jesse Campbell a écrit :

with a couple extra lines:

sam-app004 chef-client[31577]: 1: template[/nas_samcustomer/clusters/17/sam-app004/configuration/h300000017.properties] sending restart action to service[jboss-17] (delayed)
sam-app004 chef-client[31577]: 1: Processing service[jboss-17] action restart (/var/cache/chef/cookbooks/

sam/providers/jboss7cluster.rb line 23)
sam-app004 chef-client[31577]: 1: service[jboss-17] restarted
sam-app004 chef-client[31577]: 1: template[/nas_samcustomer/clusters/17/sam-app004/configuration/standalone.xmlsource] sending run action to execute[standalone-17] (delayed)
sam-app004 chef-client[31577]: 1: Processing execute[standalone-17] action run (/var/cache/chef/cookbooks/sam/providers/jboss7cluster.rb line 148)
sam-app004 chef-client[31577]: 1: execute[standalone-17] ran successfully
sam-app004 chef-client[31577]: 1: execute[standalone-17] not queuing delayed action restart on service[jboss-17] (delayed), as it's already been queued

sam-app004 chef-client[31577]: 1: Chef Run complete in 137.192547 seconds

 

-Jesse

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Daniel DeLeo < "> > wrote:

 

On Thursday, February 21, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Jesse Campbell wrote:

so... it doesn't queue a restart on a service because it was "already queued"... but the queued restart already happened.

end result: the service doesn't come up with the proper configuration

Is this a bug in 10.18? I'm resolving my issue by setting the template run of execute standalone to happen immediately, but this seems like it should be looked at?

That's a delayed notification, you wouldn't see it until the end of the run, and you clipped the part of the logs that show the delayed notifications, so I can't really say if the behavior is correct or not.

 

-- 

Daniel DeLeo