[chef] Re: Re: Re: opscode nginx_site disable not working as expected

[Sam < >]

I had a bunch of trouble with this, so we wound up with this blunt instrument: https://github.com/theodi/cuke-chef/blob/master/site-cookbooks/odi-nginx/recipes/default.rb#L60

On 4 April 2013 14:14, Sachin Sagar Rai < " target="_blank"> > wrote:

Thanks,

But I just posted that 000-default, i forgot to say that previously when the nginx is installed, it was the `default` only.

Then I added the action :disable and ran again, it changed to `000-default`

-------------------------------------------

@millisami
~ Sachin Sagar Rai
Ruby on Rails Developer
http://tfm.com.np
http://nepalonrails.com

http://funsole.com

Sent with Sparrow

On Thursday, April 4, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Mike wrote:

To disable the pre-installed default site, you probably need to do:

nginx_site '000-default' do

action :disable

end

instead.

This is probably a bug in the cookbook (I admit, I wrote the disable

part a long time ago, and at the time it worked for me), since there's

supposed to be an attribute you can use to control this behavior. Ref:

https://github.com/opscode-cookbooks/nginx/blob/master/attributes/default.rb#L80

If that doesn't work, feel free to report a bug, and send it my way.

Some packages may auto-enable the default site, and since nginx reads

site definitions alphabetically, it is common for the file to be named

000-default to be the first one loaded.

-M

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Sachin Sagar Rai < " target="_blank"> > wrote:

Hi,

I installed the nginx using the opscode cookbook nginx

https://github.com/opscode-cookbooks/nginx

And this is the last code of my recipe:

…

nginx_site 'default' do

action :disable

end

nginx_site app_name do

action :enable

end

After going into /etc/ngins/sites-enabled, I see:

lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 34 Apr 4 08:38 000-default ->

/etc/nginx/sites-available/default

lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 37 Apr 4 08:32 harstorage ->

/etc/nginx/sites-available/harapp

The question is, why just instead of removing the symlink, it renamed from

`default` to `00-default`?

It should have removed the link, why this?

-------------------------------------------

@millisami

~ Sachin Sagar Rai

Ruby on Rails Developer

http://tfm.com.np

http://nepalonrails.com

http://funsole.com

Sent with Sparrow

--
http://about.me/pikesley