> Ideally, once a community cookbook is mature enough, it should probably moveOpscode has more than once mentioned that the community should be able
> to the root namespace and be "adopted" by opscode. Thoughts?
to develop and maintain cookbooks, and that their "adoption" is in
limited capacity - it takes a lot of work.
As to namespacing, that's been discussed for quite a long time, and I
am hoping to bring up the discussion once again at the upcoming
ChefConf.
Consider how other open source communities deal with it - in many
others, there are clear "abandonment" guidelines, as well as "if
someone wants to own this and I'm no longer able to dedicate time to
it, take it" attitude.
I am hoping we can learn form them and apply such behaviors in the
Chef community, since we're all so awesome.
-M
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Cassiano Leal < "> > wrote:
> I believe that namespacing would be a good beginning, something like
> "username-apache2", while keeping opscode-maintained cookbooks in the root
> namespace e.g. "apache2".
>
> Ideally, once a community cookbook is mature enough, it should probably move
> to the root namespace and be "adopted" by opscode. Thoughts?
>
> - cassiano
>
> On Friday, April 5, 2013 at 10:24, Ranjib Dey wrote:
>
> we need some sort of namespace or quality check for the community cookbooks.
> Some of them dont event converge (from very beginning ), they also block the
> name, hence if some only actually writes a working cookbook for the same ,
> it has to be uploaded with a different name.
>
> i hope to see test kitchen run status shown against individual cookbooks,
> that would fix a lot of stuff.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Brian Akins < "> > wrote:
>
> Is anyone keeping a list of "recommended" cookbooks? The community site is
> great when the "good" cookbook matches the name of the product/service you
> are deploying, however this is not always the case. A good example is redis
> - you have to know to search for a different name and/or look at github.
>
> We are starting a list of "tested" and "approved" community cookbooks and
> was wondering if anyone had done this.
>
>
>
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.