[chef] RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: apt cookbook bug

[Matt Ray < >]

You might want to try one of the boxes listed here: https://github.com/opscode/bento and use the vagrant-omnibus plugin to put Chef on the boxes. Works great.

https://github.com/schisamo/vagrant-omnibus

Thanks,

Matt Ray

Cloud Integrations Product Lead :: Opscode

512.731.2218 ::

mattray :: GitHub :: IRC :: Twitter

---

From: Jasna Benčić < >
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 2:47 PM
To:
Subject: [chef] Re: Re: Re: Re: apt cookbook bug

 

Oh, I see, thanks for info Andrew

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Andrew Gross < " target="_blank"> > wrote:

Vagrant Boxes have their own embedded Chef version since they are a separate VM.

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Jasna Benčić < " target="_blank"> > wrote:

Good to know

I have Chef 11.6.0 on my machine but when I run vagrant provision there is Chef 10.14.2

Why is that?

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Andrew Gross < " target="_blank"> > wrote:

This fails on older versions of Chef < 11.0.0, the recent bump to 2.0 denoted this I believe.

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Jasna Benčić < " target="_blank"> > wrote:

If you find trouble with  community's apt cookbook like I did

"Recipe Compile Error in /tmp/vagrant-chef-1/chef-solo-1/cookbooks/apt/providers/repository.rb
================================================================================
NameError
---------
undefined local variable or method `use_inline_resources' for #<Class:0xb7106a14>"

Solution: Go under chef-repo/cookbooks/apt/providers/ and open repository.rb file  and erase use_inline_resources variable because it is extra and not needed... Also, it gives a headache when you are trying to run vagrant provision for  simple recipes like installation of vim or any other package that uses apt.. So,  unless you erase it apt will fail every time

Hope this helps someone,

Cheers,

Jasna