[chef] Re: Re: Re: Re: knife search'ing for an inherited recipe?

[Guy Matz < >]

Sweet!!!

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Ranjib Dey < " target="_blank"> > wrote:

just do `knife search node "recipes:foo"`,

chef stores all the recipes (defined in run_list directly or via roles) into an attribute named "recipes", as part of the run list expansion., hence you can search the recipes (as well as roles) attribute, they are top level node attributes

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Guy Matz < " target="_blank"> > wrote:

No, that didn't do the trick, if I understood you correctly:

/]$ knife search node 'run_list:recipes\[bondage\:\:dns\]'

0 items found

however:

/]$ knife search node 'role:iad-web' | grep bondage::dns | wc -l

11

/]$ knife search node 'role:auto-bonded' | grep bondage::dns | wc -l

18

/]$ knife search node 'role:auto-bonded' | head

18 items found

Node Name:   iad-hadoop105.ihr

Environment: _default

FQDN:        iad-hadoop105.ihr

IP:          10.5.40.169

Run List:    role[base], role[hadoop], role[auto-bonded]

Roles:       sendmail-smart-host, auto-bonded, base, hadoop

Recipes:     resolver, yum, ntp, timezone, cron, chef-client, zsh, users::sysadmins, sudo, emacs, vim, git, build-essential, perl, python, screen, nscd, openssh, motd-tail, operations, logrotate::syslog, vmware-tools::noop, sendmail, sendmail::sendmail_smart_host, users::hadoop, bondage::dns

Platform:    centos 6.3

Thanks again!

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Daniel DeLeo < " target="_blank"> > wrote:

On Monday, October 14, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Guy Matz wrote:

Hi!  Is there a way to "knife search node" for all of the nodes that have a specific recipe, regardless of which role has included the recipe in the run_list?

I have a recipe called bondage::dns that is in a few roles . . .  I've tried this, but it didn't work:

knife search node 'run_list:recipe\[bondage\:\:dns\]'

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks,

Guy

search for `recipes` with an 's'. This won't pick up recipes that get run via `include_recipe`, though.

-- 

Daniel DeLeo