- From: Vladimir Skubriev <
>
- To:
- Subject: [chef] Separate role for each real server (virtual machine) ?
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:05:39 +0400
What do you think about separate role for each real server (virtual
machine) ?
For example we have domain example.com,
nodes:
server1.example.com,
server2.example.com
We define a role for each of this server:
role[server1_example_com]
runlist_of_role: recipe[apt], recipe[sqlserver]
role[server2_example_com]
runlist_of_role: recipe[apt], recipe[mysqlserver]
And suppose I am use a custom script, which is set run list for each
rule in chef-repo/roles/*example.com* role's node
#!/bin/bash
# This script setup node's run_list to role[_<node-fqdn-name>] for nodes
with defined roles in ../roles directory.
# Only for roles beginning with _ (underline symbol)
# Define roles dir
# By default search a chef-repo/roles directory
CONFIGDIR="../roles"
for role in $CONFIGDIR/*example.com.rb*
do
node=`basename $role | sed -r 's/^(.*)(.example.com.rb$)/\1/' `
knife node run_list set "$node.example.com"
'role['$node'.example.com"]'
done
In this case we does not worry about node's run_lists and nodes when
reinstalling chef server.
Is i am right ?
And what do you think about one abstract role for one real server ?
--
Best regards,
CVision Lab System Administrator
Vladmir Skubriev
- [chef] Separate role for each real server (virtual machine) ?, Vladimir Skubriev, 12/12/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.