[chef] Re: Re: default recipe

[Daniel DeLeo < >]

On Friday, May 2, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Ranjib Dey wrote:
> yes, recipe[foo] implies recipe[foo::default]. but the double mention in 
> Recipes is a bug.
> earlier recipes field used to not include recipes incorporated via 
> include_recipe method. which was fixed recently (and may be during that 
> effort this bug was introduced)


We did consider this case when we made that change but probably we overlooked 
something. A bug report would be most welcome.


-- 
Daniel DeLeo