- From: "Julian C. Dunn" <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [chef] Re: Re: Best practice to declare an attribute that must be defined outside the cookbook?
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:49:21 -0400
Yes, you can do that, and also combine it with an attribute validator
if you are concerned about making sure people set something somewhere
(and that the values are valid).
Example:
https://github.com/clintoncwolfe/chef-attribute-validator
- Julian
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:18 PM, DV
<
>
wrote:
>
That's exactly what I see most cookbooks doing - setting default attributes
>
to nil when they aren't supposed to be set to anything by default.
>
>
>
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Stephen Corbesero
>
<
>
>
wrote:
>
>
>
> What is the best way to declare an attribute in attributes/default.rb
>
> which is really expected to be defined at a higher level, say an
>
> environment
>
> or even a wrapper cookbook? I am reluctant to give it a default value,
>
> since it is too easy to forget to change it when a cookbook gets deployed.
>
> In the past we have used entries like “invalid” if it is a string, or an
>
> illegal number based on the context.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Should I just go all the way and use ‘nil’? As well as adding an explicit
>
> check in the recipe to look for the undefined value and log a descriptive
>
> message?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> Stephen Corbesero, DevOps Engineer
>
>
>
> Synchronoss - Mobile Innovation for a Connected World
>
>
>
> Office: +1 484-821-4272
>
>
>
>
>
> | www.synchronoss.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
>
Best regards, Dmitriy V.
--
[ Julian C. Dunn
<
>
* Sorry, I'm ]
[ WWW:
http://www.aquezada.com/staff/julian * only Web 1.0 ]
[
gopher://sdf.org/1/users/keymaker/ * compliant! ]
[ PGP: 91B3 7A9D 683C 7C16 715F 442C 6065 D533 FDC2 05B9 ]
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.