- From: Noah Kantrowitz <
>
- To:
- Subject: [chef] Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Chef Node Access to Server via Relay Machine
- Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 12:06:50 -0700
This is was mostly being discussed as a way to work with Chef+networking
hardware, and instead that has gone in the direction of running chef on the
devices themselves.
--Noah
On Jul 12, 2014, at 12:13 AM, Tensibai Zhaoying
<
>
wrote:
>
It makes me think about an old term: managed nodes, where client on the
>
node is not possible for different reasons.
>
>
The main idea is box A run chef with ohai from box B got by ssh or other
>
mean, converge localy and do the necessary changes by the same way.
>
>
Would be useful for dmz boxes, switches, and probably others I don't think
>
of.
>
>
Is the managed node still on the chef roadmap or is it something to be
>
created from scratch ?
>
>
---- Noah Kantrowitz a écrit ----
>
>
> What you are describing is a proxy, so if a proxy is disallowed you can't
>
> do that either.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --Noah
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 11, 2014, at 7:07 PM, Kapil Shardha
>
> <
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Thanks for the suggestion. I am aware of the proxy settings but in this
>
> > case, setting up a proxy may or may not be allowed
>
(due to some constraints).
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
> > That is why I wanted to discuss and learn about some alternate solution.
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
> > I forgot to mention one point in my suggested approach. I will have to
>
> > consider allowing/adding routes for other URLs if I
>
would be using some community cookbook where the files etc are hosted on
>
AWS.
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
> > Thanks
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
> > -Kapil
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
>
>
>
> > From: Julian C. Dunn
>
> > [mailto:
>
]
>
>
>
> > Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 5:16 PM
>
>
>
> > To:
>
> >
>
>
>
>
> > Subject: [chef] Re: Chef Node Access to Server via Relay Machine
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
> > Why not just set up a proxy server between the Chef server and the node
>
> > under management? Chef Client can connect to
>
the Chef Server via a HTTP proxy.
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
> > - Julian
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Kapil Shardha
>
> > <
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >> Hi,
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >> In the Chef requirement doc
>
>
>
> >> (http://docs.opscode.com/chef_system_requirements.html
>
) , it is
>
>
>
> >> mentioned that each node and workstation must have access to the Chef
>
>
>
> >> Server via HTTPS.
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >> I have a scenario where a chef node is in an isolated network and does
>
>
>
> >> not have direct connection/ access to internet. In this scenario the
>
>
>
> >> Chef Server is hosted outside this network and is accessible over the
>
>
>
> >> internet. The same network has another machine that can connect to the
>
>
>
> >> internet. Is there a way to configure chef-client on the node to
>
>
>
> >> connect to chef-server via the machine that can access internet, as a
>
> >> relay machine?
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >> If not, I was thinking of following configuration and before I test it
>
>
>
> >> out, just want to get some input from others:
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >> 1. Configure static mapping of Chef-server IP-URL in Hosts file
>
> >> (node
>
>
>
> >> is running Windows OS)
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >> 2. On the node, create a static route for Chef-server IP with
>
> >> internet
>
>
>
> >> accessing machine as the Gateway.
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >> Do you see any issues with this setup?
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >> Thanks
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >> -Kapil
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
> > --
>
>
>
> > [ Julian C. Dunn
>
> > <
>
> * Sorry, I'm ]
>
>
>
> > [ WWW: http://www.aquezada.com/staff/julian
>
; * only Web 1.0 ]
>
>
>
> > [ gopher://sdf.org/1/users/keymaker/
>
; * compliant! ]
>
>
>
> > [ PGP: 91B3 7A9D 683C 7C16 715F 442C 6065 D533 FDC2 05B9 ]
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.