[chef] Re: Re: LXC?

[Cameron Cope < >]

I was using vagrant already, so that made vagrant-lxc basically a drop in replacement for virtualbox. I wanted to utilize snapshots for my testing though, which vagrant/vagrant-lxc don't support (last I checked), so I had to hack support into vagrant-lxc. If I was going to do it again today, I'd check the state of test kitchen + (lxc|docker).

-Cam

On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Ranjib Dey < " target="_blank"> > wrote:

i use raw rspec+ ruby-lxc a lot. its very stable, flexible and fast. I am using serverspec-lxc  as well , but for only for few selective projects where I need those specific matchers (package, service etc). You can take a look at chef-metal-lxc & chef-lxc as well (but they are more towards provisioning). test-kitchen already has a shell based lxc driver.. i wanted to get a native lxc driver for it, but couldn't find time :-(

regards

ranjib

On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Morgan Blackthorne < " target="_blank"> > wrote:

Has anyone worked with Chef testing using LXC, and if so, what did you find most helpful: vagabond, vagrant-lxc, or something else?

Thanks!

--

~*~ StormeRider ~*~

"Every world needs its heroes [...] They inspire us to be better than we are. And they protect from the darkness that's just around the corner."

(from Smallville Season 6x1: "Zod")

On why I hate the phrase "that's so lame"... http://bit.ly/Ps3uSS