- From: Carlos Camacho <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [chef] Re: Re: Re: Problem bootstraping chef-client to Windows machines
- Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 16:12:57 +0200
Ok perfect,
I thought that i was using a chef-client release candidate, maybe its
useful to only bootstrap new nodes/clients with 1 lower version to
mitigate some issues and
add one more safeguard.
The issue its exactly what you are describing, "Windows cookbook has a
dependency on ruby-wmi, but doesn't resolve this dependence and it
fails"
In this case to have a conclusion, its a problem with the Windows
cookbook instead the chef-client (Works perfect in Linux as usual)??
Best regards,
Carlos.
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Steven Danna
<
>
wrote:
>
Hi Carlos,
>
>
>> Its normal to release new client versions with this type of problems!?!?
>
>
The goal is that such problems are caught in testing and via the
>
distribution of release candidates and betas. Unfortunately, it seems
>
a problem might have gotten past those safeguards in this case.
>
>
My suspicion is that the windows cookbook has a dependency on ruby-wmi
>
but doesn't ensure it is installed. This potentially worked in past
>
versions of Chef because of Chef's own dependencies but changed with
>
the following commit:
>
>
https://github.com/opscode/chef/commit/e0c2469f3af617c34f13a32cc8b0490204be7979#diff-ea2858b57306467ffd3011d3ce3e6510
>
>
I (or someone else) will post some more details once we can look into
>
this problem.
>
>
Cheers,
>
>
Steven
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.