General discussion about Chef

[chef] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: AWS Security Groups


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Douglas Garstang < >
  • To:
  • Subject: [chef] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: AWS Security Groups
  • Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:35:13 -0800
Well, I can also see the raw content by looking at my local file, since that's not encrypted either...

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Jeff Byrnes < " target="_blank"> > wrote:
That’s correct. Knife will use your encryption key to de/encrypt the data in an encrypted data bag.

If you’d like to see the raw content of a data bag item, you can run this command:

knife exec -E "puts JSON.pretty_generate(api.get('/data/data_bag/data_bag_item'))"

That will output the raw JSON, pretty-printed, from your Chef Server.

To add to the confusion, if you have the `knife[:secret_file]` setting in your .knife.rb set, using the `knife data bag show` command will always display a decrypted data bag item, which can be _very_ confusing.

-- 
Jeff Byrnes
@berkleebassist
Lead DevOps Engineer

On November 17, 2014 at 12:24:27 PM, Douglas Garstang ( " target="_blank"> ) wrote:

I'm not following. The file is unencrypted locally. Are you saying that the knife command will encrypt the local file?


On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Fabien Delpierre < " target="_blank"> > wrote:
Yes. You can see that for yourself, just upload your JSON file with the secret, then use the knife download command to download it back from the server, then compare your original to the one you just downloaded, you'll see how the encryption works. And then you can add the encrypted version to Git, it is safe (or at least, it's as safe as your encryption key is).

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Jeff Byrnes < " target="_blank"> > wrote:
Doug,

While the file itself won’t be encrypted, it’s contents will be, so it IS safe to version the file in Git (we do in a repo that covers our data bags, environments, & roles).
-- 
Jeff Byrnes
Operations Engineer

On November 17, 2014 at 12:36:03 AM, Douglas Garstang ( " target="_blank"> ) wrote:

Oh. Thanks for that. And, that's... terrible. :( The point is not to have the unencrypted file in git.

Doug.
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Fabien Delpierre < " target="_blank"> > wrote:
RE: data bags being encrypted on the Chef server and not on your local system, that's correct.
I should say that data bags themselves are not encrypted. There's no difference between a data bag and an encrypted data bag. It's the items within the data bag that are (or aren't) encrypted. Even though they're called "encrypted data bag".
If you find it a problem that what's in your local file system is not encrypted, then what you can do is upload your JSON file with the secret (as seen in your other thread I just replied to), then delete the file from your local file system, and if you want the encrypted file locally, then just download it from the Chef server, it'll be encrypted then.



On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Douglas Garstang < " target="_blank"> > wrote:
Is there a known public cookbook for creating AWS security groups? I don't know about the security implications, but I'd like to try having the recipes creating the necessary security groups. Otherwise, it's a major hassle to put them into a script. AFAIK chef-metal/provisioner doesn't do security groups yet.

This one https://github.com/SearchSpring/aws_security, wants to use encrypted data bags and, well, that's a pain. I'd prefer to use IAM roles were possible. I'd never noticed before, but it looks like encrypted data bags are only encrypted on the Chef server, not on the local file system? If so, what's the point?

Doug





--




--



--
Regards,

Douglas Garstang
http://www.linkedin.com/in/garstang
Email: ">
Cell: +1-805-340-5627

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

§