[chef] Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Why is my windows_package source attribute getting mucked up?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Lamont Granquist < >
  • To:
  • Cc: "Fouts, Chris" < >
  • Subject: [chef] Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Why is my windows_package source attribute getting mucked up?
  • Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:17:19 -0800


On 2/12/15 7:47 AM, Fouts, Chris wrote:

On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Fouts, Chris wrote:

More (annoying) inconsistencies (in expectations) between Windows and Linux 
based nodes.
Chris
I agree there are a lot of areas where Windows functionality needs to catch 
up, but this isn’t one of them. On Linux when you install a package that 
doesn’t come from a centralized package repo, you have to use a separate 
remote file to fetch it as well. The difference is that most Linux distros 
come with a centralized package repo, which provides most of the packages you 
want. The only way Chef could make windows behave similarly is to force you 
to install Chocolatey when you install Chef. FWIW I had the exact same 
experience on Solaris a few years back where the only centralized package 
repos are (were?) 3rd party so you had to do a bit of extra work to fetch 
everything.
Also on par with AIX which has RPM package, but lacks yum support. We do better support distros that make things easier. There's also a ton of contributed code in the yum and apt providers that is user contributed.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

§