[chef] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Chef Client 12.1.0 Post-Mortem


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Ranjib Dey < >
  • To: " " < >
  • Subject: [chef] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Chef Client 12.1.0 Post-Mortem
  • Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:27:05 -0700

+1 . same here,

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Michael Fischer < " target="_blank"> > wrote:
+1 on Bluejeans.  We use it at Zendesk and I'm very pleased with its performance and usability.

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Sean Clemmer < " target="_blank"> > wrote:
Sorry for the plug, but my company happens to offer large, multi-platform video conferences: http://bluejeans.com. Up to 25 participants standard, 100 with the large meeting feature; the browser client works on Mac, Linux, and Windows.

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Bryan McLellan < " target="_blank"> > wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Angus Buchanan < " target="_blank"> > wrote:
Perhaps a community standard should be established around accessibility? That would seem like a Good Thing for an avowedly open source company to do.  Hangouts work (for some value of work!) on everything... 


Unfortunately, easy multi-platform video conferencing for 25 people is still a unicorn. Hangouts only work for 10 participants, 15 if you jump through some complex hoops with Google Apps For Work. Yes, you can do Hangouts On Air, which we still use in some cases, but we're looking for a larger number of potential participants in this case since we've usually got 10 people just from Chef in our internal post-mortems. So I fully admit, it's a compromise based on our experience with different tools and meetings.

Bryan







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

§