Thank you all for the responses.
Thanks for posting this, building your own package is indeed what you need to do if you want the package to be located somewhere else.
We have to bake the install location into the binaries in order to keep everything separate, otherwise libraries on your system could interfere with the Chef package (and vise-versa). The reason it works on windows is that windows’ shared library system works completely different than unix.
--
Daniel DeLeo
On Monday, June 8, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Eric Helgeson wrote:
> I had this in my queue to post, it should help :)
>
> https://erichelgeson.github.io/blog/2015/06/08/building-chef-source-prefix/
>
> -Eric Helgeson
> @nulleric (https://twitter.com/nulleric)
> https://usingchef.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten < "> (mailto: "> )> wrote:
> > Sounds like you're wanting a statically built copy of ruby.
> >
> > The issue you're seeing is because the operating system's dynamic linker hasn't been updated to look for library objects in chef-client's lib path. Normally this would happen during package installation.
> >
> > --
> > ~j
> >
> >
> > On Jun 8, 2015, at 01:32, Naresh < "> (mailto: "> )> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Ranjib,
> > > By portable I meant just copying the chef folder. I want to avoid installing chef-client if possible. On Windows, I can take the chef-client install folder, copy that to other location or machine and run the chef-client. That doesn't work on linux. I see the following error:
> > >
> > > ../embedded/bin/ruby: error while loading shared libraries: libruby.so.2.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Ranjib Dey < "> (mailto: "> )> wrote:
> > > > omnibus installers are fairly portable as long as your platforms are same. how are you generating the installers? or how are you packaging your app+ chef. I use fpm to repackage omnibus chef with additional gems (like ruby-lxc) and then use chef-client in localmode (which is pretty much same as solo).
> > > > What error you are seeing?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Naresh < "> (mailto: "> )> wrote:
> > > > > Hi everybody,
> > > > > We are trying to use chef-solo to install our application on linux. We plan to distribute chef (chef-client install folder) along with our application files and when user runs an install script, chef-solo will be invoked. End-user need not know that we are using chef-solo. I have copied chef folder on a different machine and tried to run a simple recipe with no success.
> > > > >
> > > > > Have any of you tried such thing? Is there a portable chef-client?
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > Naresh
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards
> > > Naresh
> >
>
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.