I have something to add: when you're too lazy to do a Google search on how to set chef log level at debug in a vagrant file and just saying it like this, without showing any effort on reading replies and answering questions in them, you'd better engage a consultant or buy a commercial support.
I'm happy to help people willing to learn, you don't show any interest on this part.
I'm not part of Chef Inc. Nor a cookbook maintenir but your mails sounds insulting anyway as you persist in this negative tone.
Douglas.Lamont,I'm biting my tongue as I write this doing my best to restrain my anger. It is quite apparent that no matter what I say, it will be deemed inappropriate. The README.md at the bottom states Opscode. It's not my place to know if that is accurate or not. I also took pains to specifically mention in my original post that it might actually be my fault. For reasons I don't understand, you've latched onto my personal opinion of a piece of software generated by a commercial enterprise being below the quality I'd expect. Again, like before, there's nothing in the community guidelines about this being not being allowed.On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Lamont Granquist <lamont@chef.io> wrote:
On 06/19/2015 07:31 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote:
Disappointing quality from something with Opscode's name on it.
Doug you've been warned repeatedly that you need to stop making statements like this.
That cookbook has also been transferred to community support by Jesse Adams, which should be obvious from the URL to the repo that you pasted, so you're actually insulting a community member. The banner at the top is incorrect and has not been updated. AFAIK nobody at Chef Software has commit rights to that repo (I certainly do not).
--Regards,
Douglas Garstang
http://www.linkedin.com/in/garstang
Email: doug.garstang@gmail.com
Cell: +1-805-340-5627
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.