- From: Roland Moriz <
>
- To:
- Subject: [chef] Re: Community cookbook maintenance (was: Re: Reprepro cookbook)
- Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 23:27:42 +0200
>
Am 22.06.2015 um 22:52 schrieb Julian C. Dunn
>
<
>:
>
>
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Adam Jacob
>
<
>
>
wrote:
>
>
> To speak for Chef Software directly, we have always had people on staff
>
> whose role was assisting the creation and maintenance of cookbooks. That
>
> number has fluctuated up and down over time, with the skill sets of people
>
> we hire, and the normal day-to-day ebb and flow of trying to figure out how
>
> to build a business that is successful. We have people on staff today who
>
> do
>
> the same. What is clear is that the energy around cookbooks in the
>
> community
>
> is far greater than the energy we can muster as an organization (regardless
>
> of how much capital we do or do not have - y'all outnumber us) - and so our
>
> focus today is on trying to build and support the best community we can,
>
> through development of the supermarket, better tooling, and providing a few
>
> key examples of how best to build a community cookbook (see Sean's work on
>
> the httpd cookbook.)
>
>
>
> Perhaps we need to organize a PR/merge festival brigade?
>
>
Hey Adam,
>
>
Would we consider transferring some of those cookbooks our of
>
{opscode,chef}-cookbooks to a community-organized org like
>
chef-brigade (https://github.com/chef-brigade) or redguide
>
(https://github.com/redguide) for better maintenance? What would be
>
the preconditions to doing that?
>
>
Personally I would like the chef-brigade and redguide to be merged,
>
but I do not remember all the players involved -- if they are on this
>
list perhaps they can speak up.
How would this prevent the problems that happend with the last migration of
former opscode-cookbooks to community maintainers?
Why should community maintainers care about the cookbooks in the future?
It can be a time consuming burden and people need to pay their rent and do
their regular jobs…
I know, this will be very provoking, but:
If Chef, inc. doesn't want to maintain even critical cookbooks anymore, is
there still a valid reason for running a public Supermarket site?
If you go the "libertarian way" there is no reason for a supermarket site to
protect/block names of cookbooks anymore that prevents users to pick other,
maybe better community resources over legacy-cookbooks that are mentioned in
guides and examples.
Either you (Chef, Inc.) control the market (e.g. maintain critical things
yourself) or you should allow the free market (=community) to compete against
each other based on equal opportunity (= namespaces or no supermarket).
Everything else/in between will just end in chaos and anarchy.
regards
Roland
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.