- From: Daniel DeLeo <
>
- To: Ferenc Kovacs <
>
- Cc: Lamont Granquist <
>, Chef Dev <
>
- Subject: [chef-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Nodejs community CK mess
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 20:02:45 -0700
On Friday, July 18, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
Hi,
>
>
I think it would be really nice to introduce vendor namespace/prefix so
>
there would be possible to for multiple apach2 cookbooks to co-exists, and
>
I think that this should be supported not only in the supermarket/berkshelf
>
but on the chef-client/server level also, so multiple cookbooks for the
>
same software can co-exists on the same chef server.
>
there is a nice blogpost explaining why is this a PITA atm:
>
http://www.rallydev.com/community/engineering/chef-dependency-solving
>
(probably most of you already read it, but maybe not everybody), and ofc.
>
anybody can start using prefixes in the cookbook names right now, but
>
having it officially supported would be better as it would make the format
>
standardized plus it would make it possible to register your own vendor
>
name in a central place so it would be less likely/impossible that two
>
vendor picked the same prefix.
Have a look at this RFC, it would solve this problem (and generally make all
the things in the blog post you linked a lot better)
https://github.com/opscode/chef-rfc/pull/20
--
Daniel DeLeo
- [chef-dev] Re: Re: Re: Nodejs community CK mess, (continued)
[chef-dev] Re: Re: Re: Nodejs community CK mess, Dreamcat4, 07/18/2014
[chef-dev] Re: Re: Nodejs community CK mess, Noah Kantrowitz, 07/18/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.