[chef-dev] Re: Re: Re: releases, github milestones, etc.

[Phil Dibowitz < >]

On 05/01/2015 02:29 PM, Lamont Granquist wrote:
> I'm more in favor of the rc being cut off of master and that's the freeze. 
> Anything that was in the minor milestone that wasn't merged to master gets
> bumped to the next milestone.  The only thing that gets cherry-picked to the
> rc branch after that is bugfixes.

I'd love that. Are we OK with that? I got the impression we weren't quite
ready for that yet.

> There's also the issue that the rc is supposed to reflect the stable code 
> that
> is going to get shipped.  Any code which is cherry-picked from master after
> the rc goes is code which got no testing in the rc.  To make the rc process
> produce a more stable shipped release we shouldn't be cherry-picking 
> anything
> other than regressions we find in the rc.

Agreed.

-- 
Phil Dibowitz                             

 
Open Source software and tech docs        Insanity Palace of Metallica
http://www.phildev.net/                   http://www.ipom.com/

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter
 and those who matter don't mind."
 - Dr. Seuss

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature