[chef] Re: Re: Re: Why port 444 for openid_url?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Joel Merrick < >
  • To:
  • Subject: [chef] Re: Re: Re: Why port 444 for openid_url?
  • Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:01:24 +0100
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jkYWVWnoU77qQpNchF0YKzRikARnsiMBd674JyX8i7NnIZgu/QNDZWtNgXcfb2voJa 5kA1LWyL8e+tXbUUHXxpFQQSu25GOvDjVh9G7coVMxLpYTzWR+fBKntNnYANPq+g705u dE6dyo3unZzyhha30LGDI3AwxgjZXm5tsh0oc=

On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Claus
Divossen< >
 wrote:
. We are using Chef on an internal site, behind
> firewalls with no direct internet access, and I was quite annoyed that I
> had to set up an OpenID server just to log in to the admin interface.


Same here, I can't wait for 0.8.0 to hit the shelves.

-- 
$ echo "kpfmAdpoofdufevq/dp/vl" | perl -pe 's/(.)/chr(ord($1)-1)/ge'



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

§