[chef] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why port 444 for openid_url?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Joel Merrick < >
  • To:
  • Subject: [chef] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why port 444 for openid_url?
  • Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:24:37 +0100
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QxpXEfhhrO0FBew/8eki9mfPYVURhtZDcti/3pGd0eS1MO5jbOxBfcUOGUDe090uyZ 0Yj4qNZ1DoV3nqVERS4emlveSZt6JjMPrBHRZR0ddjmxGV4XZ/nR/aZY4NcvRXyfq7Ga 0HGzgeuWMYJc5ajZHQKgq5eK+54TZ3PrQMPi0=

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Adam 
Jacob< >
 wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Joel 
> Merrick< >
>  wrote:
>> Does anyone know when 0.8.0 may be ready?
>
> We're working on it now.  It's a pretty heavy re-factoring of the Chef
> Server, shoring up some of the APIs that we didn't like (or just plain
> punted on.)  So the short answer is "when it's ready", the long answer
> is we're hoping to have a candidate out in September.
>
> We're on the hook to write a longer email with the details of all that
> is going in to 0.8, as well.
>
> Adam


No worry, look forward to the release!



-- 
$ echo "kpfmAdpoofdufevq/dp/vl" | perl -pe 's/(.)/chr(ord($1)-1)/ge'



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

§