- From: Joshua Timberman <
>
- To:
- Subject: [chef] Re: System configuration tool comparison
- Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 02:35:51 -0600
Hi Bart!
Thank you for including Chef in your comparison!
As Chef is an actively developed project, the version you reviewed, 0.8.8, is
at this point 5 months old. We have had a 'major' release (0.9.0) in that
time and several point releases (current is 0.9.8). New features for
consideration in your evaluation:
* Windows is now a supported platform (as of 0.8.14), and gets better with
each release.
* The Opscode Platform (our commercial product offering) supports strong
role-based access control (as of 0.9.0). This is API based rather than
system-user based.
Also a couple clarifications on specific points on the list:
* User interface, the web interface is mainly used for management of
components. Reporting is a feature we may develop more in the future.
* Deployment architecture, when used client/server that is true (centralized,
pull), though Chef can also be used in a standalone mode called Chef Solo.
* Monitoring the infrastructure can be done a variety of ways (status from
knife or the webui, exception/reporting handlers, querying the server
data/search indexes). Also, Opscode provides a few cookbooks for configuring
monitoring tools (notably nagios and munin).
* Versioning support is in early phases for cookbooks uploaded to a Chef
Server, and will be fully developed in an upcoming release.
* Available documentation should also include that Opscode provides open
training materials that are under a creative commons license.
Feel free to ask if you have any further questions.
On Aug 13, 2010, at 2:56 AM, Bart Vanbrabant wrote:
>
Hi,
>
>
Since there are a lot of system configuration tools (both commercial
>
and open-source), it is difficult to know what tool if right for you.
>
Therefore, we developed a framework that you can use to compare system
>
configuration tools. This framework, together with a set of 11 tools
>
that are evaluated using this framework will be published in a paper
>
and presented at the LISA'10 conference (http://www.usenix.org/events/
>
lisa10).
>
>
Since Chef is a well known tool within the system administration
>
community, we included it in our comparison. We also set up a website
>
that accompanies the paper. On this website, you will find the full
>
evaluation of Chef at http://sysconfigtools.cer-wiki.info/tool/chef
>
My question to you: if you want to help us making this website and our
>
paper better, please review Chef (or other tools you are familiar
>
with) and provide us with comments, either by email or using the
>
comment-facility on the website.
>
>
The website URL is temporary, we are going to migrate this website a
>
'official' university URL. You will see that for each tool, there
>
exist a large number of properties that are evaluated. Clicking on
>
these properties gives you an overlay with more information about that
>
property.
>
>
Note that the deadline for the paper submission is the 24th of august.
>
Comments that might trigger chances in the paper should be received
>
before that date. We are going to maintain this website, so comments
>
are also welcome after the 24th of august.
>
>
Thank you very much in advance
>
>
Kind Regards
>
>
--
>
Bart Vanbrabant
>
Doctoral Researcher
>
DistriNet, dept. Computer Science, K.U.Leuven Belgium
>
>
Thomas Delaet
>
Post-doctoral Researcher
>
DistriNet, dept. Computer Science, K.U.Leuven Belgium
>
>
>
>
>
>
Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
--
Opscode, Inc
Joshua Timberman, Technical Evangelist
C: 720.334.RUBY E:
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.