[chef] Re: Re: commands output for execute/script resources

[Alex Soto < >]

I'd like to see:
- the ability to turn on the command output when the command fails instead of 
the error message Dan mentioned
- when you tell it to ignore a non-zero result code, I'd like to not display 
the output

On Nov 2, 2010, at 9:18 AM, Seth Falcon wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Vladimir Girnet
> <
 >
>  wrote:
>> Sometimes it is required to see output of a command or a script. I know 
>> that
>> "-l debug" will display it, but it will also display a lot of non-required
>> debug information.
>> 
>> Is there a way to display output of a specific "execute", "package" or
>> "script/bash" resources, except debug mode?
>> 
>> Is it possible to add for "execute", "package" and "script/bash" resources 
>> a
>> new option "output", which is by default false, but can be set to true to
>> display execution results?
> 
> Is it that you want to process the output of a resource or just see it
> in the logs in more detail?
> If I'm understanding right, you just want the output to appear in the
> log.  I'd like to understand a bit more on the motivation.  Is this
> for debugging, but where debug -l produces too much info or for
> another purpose?
> 
> + seth